binutils-apple/sim/testsuite/bpf/ at master · theoparis.com/binutils-apple · Tangled

theoparis.com / binutils-apple

0

WIP MachO binutils port assisted by AI I may consider upstreaming this in the future.

0

binutils-apple / sim / testsuite / bpf /

at master 13 files

Jose E. Marchesi sim: bpf: remove support for ldinddw and ldabsdw instructions 2y ago

sim: bpf: remove support for ldinddw and ldabsdw instructions This patch removes support for the two instructions above from the GNU simulator, including the corresponding tests. These instructions do not really exist in BPF and are not recognized as such by the kernel verifier. This has now been pointed out during the standardization of the BPF ISA. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>

2 years ago

sim: bpf: fix testsuite due to linker warnings [PR sim/29954] On a bpf-*-* testsuite fails: ./ld/ld-new: warning: test has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions Adjusting `--memory-size=10Mb' to the simulator bpf testsuite passes. Tested on bpf-*-*: Bug: https://sourceware.org/PR29954 sim/testsuite: * bpf/allinsn.exp (SIMFLAGS_FOR_TARGET): Adjust sim flags.

3 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: remove support for ldinddw and ldabsdw instructions This patch removes support for the two instructions above from the GNU simulator, including the corresponding tests. These instructions do not really exist in BPF and are not recognized as such by the kernel verifier. This has now been pointed out during the standardization of the BPF ISA. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago

sim: bpf: do not use semicolon to begin comments The BPF assembler has been updated to follow the clang convention in the interpretation of semicolons: they separate statements and directives, and do not start line comments.

2 years ago